tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post5086757926601705401..comments2024-01-22T21:02:15.202-05:00Comments on The Corporate Headquarters of the San Antonio Gunslingers: I feel like the guy who keeps giving money to a carnie.LDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08416468186977171781noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post-2833013245505752342007-09-07T08:55:00.000-04:002007-09-07T08:55:00.000-04:00LD,I found the pre-game rankings and the respectiv...LD,<BR/><BR/>I found the pre-game rankings and the respective records from a youtube vid of that Sugar Bowl. Figured a captured television broadcast would be good enough evidence:<BR/><BR/>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3Grf2XJKPg<BR/><BR/>(HTML illiterate)<BR/><BR/>WVU fans tend to be rather indignant when their team is dissed. I still love the site.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post-40636062623208217592007-09-07T06:11:00.000-04:002007-09-07T06:11:00.000-04:00The Dawgs were ranked eighth in the AP and coaches...The Dawgs were ranked eighth in the AP and coaches' polls, and seventh in the BCS, before the bowl game. WVU was 11th.<BR/><BR/>http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/rankingsindex?pollId=null&weekNumber=15&seasonYear=2005<BR/><BR/>(Sorry if that doesn't show up in hypertext...Blogger's instructions show up in Dutch over here...)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post-48545411666474493712007-09-06T23:47:00.000-04:002007-09-06T23:47:00.000-04:00I've looked around, and I can't tell whether the e...I've looked around, and I can't tell whether the espn game report shows the rankings after the game or beforehand. <BR/><BR/>If the rankings are after the fact, my bad.LDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08416468186977171781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post-70174542098921606562007-09-06T23:37:00.000-04:002007-09-06T23:37:00.000-04:00Have I become illiterate, or does this say "WVU (5...Have I become illiterate, or does this say "WVU (5) vs UGA (10)"?<BR/><BR/>http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=260020061<BR/><BR/>Point taken on the "much better record" part. <BR/><BR/>Feel free to leave a name, anonymous. You can even make one up.LDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08416468186977171781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post-84086646956267170022007-09-06T21:33:00.000-04:002007-09-06T21:33:00.000-04:00Oh, one more about the '06 Sugar Bowl. Records en...Oh, one more about the '06 Sugar Bowl. Records entering the game: <BR/><BR/>UGA 10-2<BR/><BR/>WVU 10-1<BR/><BR/>Not quite a "much better record."<BR/><BR/>--Anonymous, againAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post-69711395383722322312007-09-06T21:30:00.000-04:002007-09-06T21:30:00.000-04:002006 Sugar Bowl:#11 WVU vs. #7 UGA. And that migh...2006 Sugar Bowl:<BR/><BR/>#11 WVU vs. #7 UGA. And that might be the first time I've seen turnover advantage used against a team. <BR/><BR/>Otherwise, great article, great site.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post-16494057614027503722007-09-06T21:21:00.000-04:002007-09-06T21:21:00.000-04:00You don't get it.Mandel's sarcasm is intended as a...You don't get it.<BR/><BR/>Mandel's sarcasm is intended as a shot at the SEC. Mandel's sarcasm also is an argument that is completely illogical and fact-free.LDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08416468186977171781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10778854.post-44915316302810381802007-09-06T20:00:00.000-04:002007-09-06T20:00:00.000-04:00I can't decide whether you completely missed the s...I can't decide whether you completely missed the sarcasm in Mandel's post or whether this is 18 different levels of satire that I just don't get.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com