Sunday, March 01, 2009

If I'm gonna be a dick, I only want the challenge of being a MASSIVE dick.

So Curt Schilling says if he comes back he'd want to take on the "challenge" of either the Cubs or Rays.


The Cubs had the best record in the National League and the second best record in the Majors in 2008.

The Rays made the World Series last year and had the second best record in the AL in 2008.

Similarly, if I were to bother playing in the Ryder Cup, I'd only want the challenge of being paired with Tiger Woods.  If I were to lower myself to playing professional football, I'd only want to try to fix the problems facing the Steelers, or maybe the Patriots.  If I were to act in a movie, I'd only agree to allow my amazing talents to improve the dreck the Coen Brothers put out.  

Seriously, if Stephon Marbury said this week that he was looking forward to the challenge of the Celtics, the media would have mocked him senseless.  Schilling's got Platinum Crown Club priviliges on Douche Air Lines, but nobody seems to mention this.  


Read More...

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Flick the Button

1.  Leatherheads.  I fell asleep.  What was attempted was not as entertaining as what resulted.  You're Fired.


2.  Eagle Eye.  I did not fall asleep, but this sucked.  SPOILER ALERT: They steal the ending from the Simpsons episode where Homer remakes Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.  And it is so ridiculous.  You're Fired.  

3.  Ghost Town.  They don't make many comedies like this - not exactly a romcom, not a grossout - which end up kind of funny and sweet, but not that good either.  Gervais is a genius, but he's too restrained here.  And Tea Leoni is only in mediocre or worse movies (and usually that's not her fault).  A decent try for an adult comedy, but still blah.  You're Fired.

4.  Fred Claus.  The worst Christmas movie I have ever seen, and I've seen Prancer and Santa Claus: The Movie and Toys and Jingle All the Way and some other pieces of shit.  Totally useless.  Paul Giamatti, Miranda Richardson, Elizabeth Banks and Rachel Weisz should all be ashamed of themselves.  You're Fired.

5.  WALL-E.  I feel like I'm alone in thinking this way, but I sensed that this was (a) the least funny Pixar film and (b) the most preachy Pixar film.  And I'm not insensitive to what it was preaching about, and I thought Cars was not good.  There's cuteness but I didn't really want to see it again - and I can't say that about any other Pixar film except Cars.  I feel bad about myself for not liking this more.  You're Fired.

6.  The House Bunny.  Throwaway.  Anna Faris is funnier than anything that has ever been written for her, but that also does not mean she's all that great.  I'm struggling to remember anything about this.  It had a few "oh wait, is that [girl from American Idol/girl from Superbad/Bruce Willis' daughter]?" moments.  You're Fired.

7.  Mamma Mia!.  Jesus.  You're Fired.

8.  Mongol.  Gorgeously shot and consistently interesting.  Made me want to see a sequel and learn more about Genghis Khan.  See this.  Cadillac.

9.  Death Race.  Statham!  Say it while you're fucking!  Shockingly entertaining.  Of course it's objectively terrible, yet rewatchable and absolutely awesome.  My math says Steak Knives.

10.  Hamlet 2.  I like Coogan, but I was bored.  The movie thinks it's more clever than it is.  Maybe I would've liked it better if I had been into drama in high school or something.  For a movie that seeks its humor from the ridiculous, this wasn't ridiculous enough.  You're Fired.

11.  Appaloosa.  The first hour or so is awesome, but it falls apart in the last half hour or so.  Women screw everything up, especially Renee Zellweger (whom I had no idea was in this movie) apparently.  As long as Ed Harris and Viggo are killing people, this rules.  When they start building houses and feelings start to matter, this has problems.  Steak Knives.

12.  Pineapple Express.  A matter of expectations.  I expected funnier, or maybe I expected Franco to be as good as he was.  Just not surprised by anything.  I was entertained though.  Steak Knives.  

13.  Bangkok Dangerous (2008).  Horribly horribly and hilariously incredible.  Come for Nic Cage's outrageous forehead, stay for the ridiculousness.  Between this and The Protector, Thailand has become the go-to nation for comedy.  If only we could get Statham in one of those Thai movies...  Steak Knives (yep!).

14. Max Payne.  Ugh.  Wahlberg has no sense of humor at all.  Awful.  You're Fired.

15. Man on Wire.  An entertaining and inspiring dude, and a well made film.  Recommended.  Sharp Steak Knives.

16. Slumdog Millionaire.  OK, I feel strongly about this movie.  If you left this film not entertained, you are a prig and I don't want to hang out with you.  It was suspenseful, funny, romantic, interesting, timeless, universal, and most importantly, just a good movie.  It was about goodness and humanity.  Political posturing about this is dickish.  Cadillac.

17. Encounters at the End of the World.  Watch Planet Earth instead if you want to see awesome footage of nature.  Watch this if you want to be underentertained about not-as-interesting-as-presented people.  Maybe I'm not a Herzog guy.  You're Fired.

18. Vicky Cristina Barcelona.  Only a guy like Woody Allen could get this movie made.  It's not really about much of anything.  It's kind of entertaining - the acting is quite good and everyone and everything looks pretty.  It's also not really memorable.  It'll make you smile a bit, but then forget it.  You're Fired.

19. The Visitor.  It's OK, I suppose, but I get the sense that critics like simple movies that don't screw things up more than complicated movies that make a few mistakes but also challenge.  I wasn't bored, but I didn't learn anything either.  I'll forget I've seen this, even though it's not bad.  You're Fired.

20.  The Diplomat.  The NY Times TV critic that praised this enough for me to watch it owes me 3 hours.  They took a 2 hour movie screenplay and made it shittily so it stretched.  Massive plot holes.  Deus Ex Machina througout.  Someone teaching a class on screenwriting should use this as a "DO NOT DO THIS" lecture.  But I did learn that my cable company carries something called "ION TV," so it wasn't a total loss.  You're Fired, and that means you, NYT critic.

21.  Zack and Miri Make a Porno.  Like Kevin Smith's good movies, it's really dirty (moreso than even I expected), but also pretty sweet.  I don't mind the filth if there's a reason.  Elizabeth Banks is funny - really funny.  Steak Knives.

22.  The Rocker.  Blah.  Not exactly the Dwight Schrute thing, but not exactly funny.  Forgettable, and I just saw it.  You're Fired.

23.  The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.  Gorgeously shot, and the first hour or so is great (especially the tugboat/submarine scene).  But the last hour (I'm not kidding) is just Ralph Lauren-esque photo shoots of Brad Pitt looking good.  And the Katrina-era flash forwards did not add to the film.  Cutting this up more would've helped.  If it matters, The Lady liked this a good deal more than I did.  Perhaps I'm nitpicking... I did like a lot of it, but I just have these nagging concerns I can't seem to get rid of and that seem to make me like this less and less.  Still, worth seeing.  Steak Knives.

Read More...

Saturday, February 07, 2009

On the current scenaria.

Our economy sucks a fatttttt dick right now;


I am ready for things to turn around now. now. now. now. now.

But in the meantime, I suppose it's OK to think it's good enough that marauding tribes of machete-wielding zealots aren't murdering our families in our sleep.  

positivity..  really.

Read More...

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Lebowski Standings - Final 2008

Done this in past years.  Rankings based upon who had the best season at winning each game on their schedule.  Ties among teams with the same record are broken via ColleyRatings strength of schedule, except where one team won a head-to-head matchup.  Full list below the fold.


120.  Washington  0-12 (1)
119.  North Texas 1-11 (102)
118.  SMU 1-11 (77)
117.  Washington State  2-11 (50)
116.  Miami U.  2-10 (113)
115.  Western Kentucky  2-10 (103)
114.  Idaho  2-10  (98)
113.  Tulane  2-10 (85)
112.  Iowa State  2-10 (76)
111.  San Diego State  2-10 (71)
110.  Eastern Michigan  3-9 (105)
109.  Army  3-9 (101)
108.  New Mexico State  3-9 (97)
107.  Indiana  3-9 (64)
106.  Utah State  3-9 (48)
105.  Michigan  3-9 (36)
104.  Toledo  3-9  (108)*
103.  Syracuse  3-9 (16)
102.  Kent State  4-8 (125)
101.  Louisiana-Monroe  4-8 (124)
100.  Ohio  4-8 (110)
99.  Wyoming  4-8 (81)
98.  Marshall  4-8 (70)
97.  Central Florida  4-8 (93)*
96.  UAB  4-8 (104)*
95.  New Mexico  4-8 (51)
94.  Mississippi State  4-8 (45)
93.  Texas A&M  4-8 (44)
92.  Purdue  4-8  (41)
91.  UCLA  4-8  (28)
90.  Baylor  4-8 (12)
89.  Duke  4-8 (8)
88.  MTSU  5-7 (122)
87.  Florida International  5-7 (119)
86.  Akron  5-7 (115)
85.  Temple  5-7 (106)
84.  UTEP  5-7 (84)
83.  Kansas State  5-7 (80)
82.  Louisville  5-7 (68)
81.  Illinois  5-7 (55)
80.  Tennessee  5-7 (32)
79.  Auburn  5-7 (38)*
78.  Colorado  5-7 (23)
77.  Stanford  5-7 (22)
76.  Arizona State  5-7 (53)*
75.  UNLV  5-7 (72)*
74.  Arkansas  5-7 (6)
73.  Virginia  5-7 (2)
72.  Northern Illinois  6-7 (118)
71.  Memphis  6-7 (111)
70.  NC State  6-7 (11)
69.  Hawaii  7-7 (75)
68.  Arkansas State  6-6 (123)
67.  Louisiana-Lafayette  6-6 (126)*
66.  Bowling Green  6-6 (117)
65.  San Jose State  6-6 (107)
64.  Florida Atlantic  7-6 (109)
63.  Southern Mississippi  7-6 (96)
62.  Fresno State  7-6 (95)
61.  Minnesota  7-6 (88)
60.  Nevada  7-6 (82)
59.  Wisconsin  7-6 (66)
58.  Notre Dame  7-6 (63)
57.  Colorado State  7-6 (61)
56.  Kentucky  7-6 (56)
55.  U. of Miami 7-6 (18)
54.  South Carolina  7-6 (14)
53.  Clemson  7-6 (21)*
52.  Vanderbilt  7-6 (13)
51.  Buffalo  8-6 (94)
50.  Troy  8-5 (121)
49.  Louisiana Tech 8-5 (114)
48.  Central Michigan  8-5 (112)
47.  Houston  8-5 (92)
46.  Arizona  8-5 (79)
45.  Air Force  8-5 (78)
44.  Navy  8-5 (86)*
43.  Connecticut  8-5 (58)
42.  Louisiana State  8-5 (47)
41.  Kansas  8-5 (29)
40.  South Florida  8-5 (67)*
39.  Rutgers  8-5 (59)*
38.  North Carolina  8-5 (20)
37.  Wake Forest  8-5 (9)
36.  Maryland  8-5 (46)*
35.  East Carolina  9-5 (83)
34.  Boston College  9-5 (30)
33.  Western Michigan  9-4 (116)
32.  Iowa  9-4 (74)
31.  Northwestern 9-4 (87)*
30.  West Virginia  9-4 (54)
29.  Oklahoma State  9-4 (43)
28.  Michigan State  9-4 (37)
27.  Nebraska  9-4 (34)
26.  California  9-4 (31)
25.  Florida State  9-4 (27)
24.  Georgia Tech  9-4 (42)*
23.  Mississippi  9-4 (26)
22.  Pittsburgh  9-4 (15)
21.  Oregon State  9-4 (7)
20.  Missouri  10-4 (39)
19.  Virginia Tech  10-4 (17)
18.  Rice  10-3 (100)
17.  Brigham Young  10-3 (91)
16.  Oregon  10-3 (52)
15.  Ohio State 10-3 (40)
14.  Georgia  10-3 (10)
13.  Tulsa  11-3 (120)
12.  Cincinnati  11-3 (62)
11.  TCU  11-2 (69)
10.  Penn State  11-2 (65)
9.  Texas Tech  11-2 (60)
8.  Ball State  12-2 (127)
7.  Alabama  12-2 (33)
6.  Oklahoma 12-2 (4)
5.  Boise State  12-1 (99)
4.  Southern California  12-1 (35)
3.  Texas  12-1 (5)
2.  Florida  13-1 (3)
1.  Utah  13-0 (73)

Read More...

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Too bad all the Tech Fans had left already

I love Les Miles.


Any man who will run a fake punt while up 35 in the 4th quarter on Georgia Tech gets my lifelong affection.  Bravo to you, sir.  

Amazing dickishness.  All my praise comes your way.  

Read More...

Monday, December 29, 2008

A College Football Primer for NFL Fans

This play is a microcosm of how the Georgia-Georgia Tech series has typically gone (this year notwithstanding).


That is all.

Read More...

Sunday, December 07, 2008

If Lorne Michaels is still alive

MAKE JORMA TACCONE A CAST MEMBER OF SNL.

He's a writer and was hysterical in the classic digital short last night.  Dude is a genius.  If you haven't already, go rent Hot Rod and focus on Kevin.  Hilarious.


Read More...

Flick the Button

Oh crap I'm way behind on these.  I know I've missed some of them...


1.  Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.  Waste of time.  Old people running but not hilariously.  And homages to movies that weren't that good to begin with.  And that's before we get to the alien bullshit.  You're Fired.

2.  Iron Man.  Without Downey, this is Daredevil.  But with Downey, this is great fun.  Is it just me, or does Downey seem like the kind of actor that actually entertains, rather than the sort that Hollywood thinks we're interested in?  I want to see this again.  Cadillac.

3.  The Incredible Hulk.  Wasn't as fun as Iron Man, but I still liked it.  I liked how there wasn't a deeper meaning, just popcorn.  And I liked how instead of picking a world landmark to blow up in CGI, they for the most part just destroyed a college campus.  Steak Knives.

4.  Forgetting Sarah Marshall.  A little long, a little painful, but funny at times too.  I can't help liking Russell Brand or Kristin Bell either.  There's kind of a problem with the Apatow stable writing their therapy sessions into their movies, but they get some pretty good jokes in too.  I would go see the vampire musical.  Steak Knives.

5.  You Don't Mess with the Zohan.  I don't believe it myself, but this was funny.  Honestly, I thought I would hate this so much, but everyone in it has this stupid smile on their face and the jokes aren't as quite easy as the last 5 or 6 Sandler comedies (like I said, Apatow gets some jokes in).  I've seen a lot of pretty bad movies lately, and stunningly, this wasn't one.  Steak Knives (and I liked it better than Sarah Marshall).

6.  Get Smart.  So was Anne Hathaway supposed to be Steve Carrell's love interest?  If so, that's weird.  Anyway, if this was supposed to be funny, it wasn't.  It also wasn't exciting.  A complete failure.  You're Fired.

7.  Baby Mama.  Forgotten just about everything about this, and I like Tina Fey and Amy Poehler and I've been through the baby thing recently enough to get the jokes.  I guess I liked Amy Poehler's Philly accent.  You're Fired.

8.  The Foot Fist Way.  I'd like to see this a few more times, at increasing levels of drunkenness.  Sure, the plot doesn't really exist.  Danny McBride is hilarious nonetheless.  Steak Knives (but I reserve the right to increase this upon future viewings).

9.  Smart People.  Offensively bad.  You're Fired.

10.  Charlie Bartlett. Anton Yelchin is game, but it's not as funny or interesting as it could've been.  And it felt like Downey was reined in.  We've been here before and funnier.  You're Fired.

11.  Role Models.  We've been here before, but not funnier.  Take a formulaic comedy, add T&A, add copious amounts of cussing, add funny actors and a director that knows comic timing.  I know you're thinking that this is a movie you can wait for a rental, but definitely remember to rent it.  It's very funny.  Steak Knife/Cadillac.

12.  Kung Fu Panda.  Way more violent than I was expecting.  Not for kids under 10 or so, I'd guess.  But it is kind of amusing and kind of entertaining.  Definitely feels like a Dreamworks animated movie and not a Pixar movie, and that's not a good thing.  Fired/Knife.

13.  Hellboy II: The Golden Army.  Having a locker full of Tecate in a can is fucking awesome.  I liked this a hell of a lot more than the first one, and a lot more than most action or comic movies.  Not quite Iron Man level, because Pearlman is good but not Downey great.  Also better than Hulk and 2 of the 3 Spiderman movies.  Sharp Steak Knives.

14. State of Play.  Why are British television miniseries better than most American feature films?  Well acted and well written.  Yes, there are some timeline problems (people appearing in 2 spots across London within moments).  It's still as interesting as anything I've watched in a year.  And everything Bill Nighy does is gold.  See this before the Ben Affleck/Russell Crowe 2 hour version comes out (though I trust Kevin MacDonald to do a decent job).  Cadillac.

15. The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2.  Obviously this was a choice of the Lady's (and she'd seen the first one when I wasn't around).  Umm...  It's OK if you want to see something like this?  I didn't want to particularly watch it, and I spent most of the time on the computer or reading, but it didn't bother me that it was on.  Fired, I guess?

16. Hancock.  I liked the idea, but the outcome wasn't exactly good.  The CGI was confusing: the flying looked like the original Superman green-screening, but some other stuff looked pretty cool.  It was short, which was fine because the movie was kind of crappy.  Even though I have no idea what they could've done to make it better, I don't think they focused on the most interesting things about the characters.  You're Fired.  

17. Step Brothers.  I take great care in saying this: I do not think another movie made this decade has as many great one-liners.  I know this movie will get repeat viewings.  Don't fall for the conventional wisdom that Ferrell is passe.  Semi-Pro just sucked.  This was funny.  Cadillac.

18. Wanted.  I watch a lot of crappy action movies, so when I see one that I like I might go overboard on it.  That may be why I got fired up about Iron Man and Hellboy II.  I liked Wanted better than either.  It's action scenes are crazy and kind of goofy, but they just work.  McAvoy seems like an odd choice for an action star, but he pulls it off.  And Jolie, well, what can you say?  She's a freak of nature.  I liked the dialogue, I liked the stunt sequences, I liked the plot (even though I could kind of figure things out).  I would like for there to be more of these movies.  I was upset when it ended.  Cadillac.

19.  Tropic Thunder.  We have so many comedies lately that are really just ad-lib scenes in a tired setup; it's almost odd when we see a comedy that has an actual plot more than just a skeleton for sketches.  This was kind of a real movie, that happened to have funny scenes in it (aside from a few sequences).  Downey, again, is the star among stars.  He's the funniest in a cast of guys who usually carry their own comedies.  He's a fantastic actor.  I'd like to see him nominated for awards for this performance.  I don't know if there are many actors who could have pulled it off.  Cadillac.

20.  The Protector.  Might be the best movie to watch while drunk ever.  Baby elephants; kicking; ridiculous music, lighting and costumes; Thai canal boat chases that lead to helicopter explosions (which Die Hard 4 totally ripped off!); kinda trippy animation; actors that look like Street Fighter characters.  Wildly hilarious.  Also: this movie could have been made in 1985 or 2015 and sent back in a time machine.  We'll never know.   It's insanely, entertainingly ridiculous.  Cadillac.

Read More...

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Yikes

472 yards rushing against a D that only gave up 23 points and 345 total yards to Florida? And we gave up how many yards to that freshman Kentucky QB on the option? Scary.

I'm not feeling as good about 8 in a row as I was a few months ago.

Read More...

Monday, November 17, 2008

Set your TiVos

The Nightman cometh on Thursday.



Read More...

Saturday, November 15, 2008

General Bowl Predictions

Looks like a Disney New Years for UGA. Dawg fans hoping for the Cotton Bowl need to learn the rules. The BCS will likely take both Alabama and Florida. Capital One picks first of the remaining SEC teams. Even if we lose to Tech, I don't see the erstwhile Citrus Bowl picking 3-loss LSU over us. But if they did take the Bayou Bengals, the Cotton can't take an SEC East team until the Outback Bowl chooses one first. Thus, LSU and presumably South Carolina would have to be more attractive than Georgia for us to go to Dallas.

For the best possible bowl matchup, Dawg fans should root for both Oregon State and USC to win out. If those two "top" Pac-10 teams win the rest of their games, both will go to the BCS, leaving the Big 10 with only 1 BCS team, and the Dawgs would face the Buckeyes or Penn State (if they lose to Michigan State). If one or both of those Pac 10 teams lose, that would open the door for a Big 10 non-champion to go to the Fiesta, and Georgia would probably face Michigan State in Mousetown.

Here's how I see things shaking out for the BCS and SEC tie-in bowls:

BCS Championship: Texas Tech v. Florida
Rose Bowl: Oregon State v. Penn State
Fiesta Bowl: Texas v. Southern Cal
Sugar Bowl: Alabama v. Cincinnati
Orange Bowl: Maryland v. Utah

Capital One Bowl: Georgia v. Ohio State
Cotton Bowl: LSU v. Oklahoma
Outback Bowl: South Carolina v. Michigan State
Chick-Fil-A Bowl: Vanderbilt v. some ACC chump
Liberty Bowl: Kentucky v. some Conference USA chump
Music City Bowl: Ole Miss v. some ACC chump
Independence Bowl: Non SEC v. some irrelevant chump
PapaJohns.com Bowl: Non SEC v. some irrelevant chump

Yep. I predict the SEC will be 2 teams shy of fulfilling their contractual tie-ins. The only teams not listed above that could become bowl eligible are Auburn if they beat Alabama (yeah, right), and Arkansas if they beat both Mississippi State and LSU (unlikely).


I heard Kirk Herbstreit on the radio last week say that he thinks his Buckeyes would go to the Sugar to face the loser of the SEC Championship Game. That statement shows his fundamental misunderstanding of how the BCS works.

There are ten BCS slots. 6 are automatic conference champs (ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big XII, Pac 10, and SEC). We can safely assume that the SEC and the Big XII will each get an extra BCS team. That leaves two spots, and this year, one is reserved for Cinderella. Because of the mediocrity of the ACC and Big East, it is all but certain that there will be a BCS buster this year. Even if Utah, Boise, and Ball State each lose all of their remaining games, BYU would very likely be in the Top 16 and ranked above the champion of one or both the ACC and Big East. (BYU and Utah's only remaining game is against each other). That leaves the last spot for either a second Pac 10 team or a second Big 10 team, but not both.

It's possible for Ohio State to go to the Rose or Fiesta, but the Sugar is simply too long a shot. If Penn State loses to Michigan State, and Ohio State beats Michigan, then the Buckeyes go to Pasadena. If that doesn't happen, Ohio State should hope for an Oregon State loss, sending USC to the Rose, raising the chance for the Buckeyes to be selected by the Fiesta.

For Ohio State to go to the Sugar, the Fiesta would have to decide not to take Ohio State, and instead choose either a BCS party-crasher (the highest ranked of Utah/Boise/Ball St./BYU) or the Big East champ (likely the winner of Pitt v. Cincy). Not bloody likely.

Let me explain my predictions above, and it may shed some light on the procedure, for Herbsreit's edification:

#1 and #2 go to the BCS championship. The bowl that "loses" the #1 team picks next. I predict Texas Tech to win the Big XII and be #1 in the final BCS standings. The Fiesta would pick Texas for their first slot. Assuming Florida wins the SEC and sits at #2, the Sugar picks next to replace the SEC champ, and they will take Alabama.

The Rose Bowl will have the Pac 10 champ against the Big 10 champ. Oregon State controls its own destiny. The road is tough with its final two games against teams with winning records (which are rare in the Pac 10). First they play at Arizona (6-4), then finish the season at home in the Civil War against archrival Oregon (8-3). Making things even tougher, the Ducks have a week off to prepare while the Beavers duel in the desert with the Wildcats. Still, I think Jaquizz and the boys will win their way to Pasadena to face Paterno and PSU.

The ACC champ automatically goes to the Orange. I'm guessing Maryland, but it could just as easily be any of a bunch of other equally mediocre teams.

The final three slots are on a yearly rotation, with this year the order being Fiesta, Sugar, Orange. The Big East champion must be selected at some point, as must the highest ranked team from a non-BCS conference if they are in the top 12 or in the top 16 and ahead of a BCS conference champ, which I predict will be Utah. The Fiesta also could select an at-large team, i.e., any team in the top 14 whose conference does not have two teams already slotted. If what I predict above is correct, then USC and Ohio State are really the only contenders for the last at-large bid. USC is ranked much higher, beat tOSU head-to-head, and its fan-base is closer to Glendale, so I see the Trojans getting the nod to face Texas. (This is what sends the Buckeyes to Orlando to face Georgia).

After the Fiesta picks, the Sugar has only two options. It must pick either (1) the "Cinderella" which will probably be Utah or (2) the Big East champ, which I predict will be Cincinnati with a win over Pitt. Even though Utah would be ranked ahead of the Bearcats, simple economics come into play. Although "Mormon" and "Bourbon" loosely rhyme, the two don't really go together, and Utah fans won't spend as much in the French Quarter as the Big East blue-collar boozers. If, however, Florida loses to Alabama, the Sugar Bowl may select Utah over the winner of Pitt/Cincy to set up Urban Meyer against his old team, but I doubt that is enough of a pull to overcome the money matters.

Whichever of those two that the Sugar doesn't pick will face the ACC champ in the Orange Bowl.

Are there other possibilities? Sure. In my list above, Bama and Florida are interchangeable, depending on the outcome in Atlanta. The SEC champ's opponent is still up in the air, too. If the Big XII South representative wins the conference championship game in Kansas City, they'll win the opportunity to play for the Crystal Pigskin. I predict Texas Tech, but if Oklahoma beats the Red Raiders and Okie State, the Big XII South will decided by highest BCS ranking among Texas Tech, Texas, and Oklahoma. My guess is Texas would then sneak in to play Mizzou, but Oklahoma might overcome their head-to-head loss to Texas with an impressive final-week win over Oklahoma State. Regardless of who wins that mysterious tiebreaker, if the Big XII North can pull out the upset in KC, that would pull the pin on this year's BCS exploding shit grenade. USC could then sneak back into the title game, unless the Beavers prevent the Trojans from winning their conference, in which case Penn State may have new life. But why not let an undefeated Utah jump all 1-loss teams to face the SEC champ in that scenario?

So there's still a lot yet to be seen, including whether Kirk Herbstreit will ever learn the rules. I'm looking forward to some colossal games in the coming weeks, particularly Oklahoma v. Texas Tech and Florida v. Alabama, as well as the State Championship game in Athens on 11/29.

Read More...

Saturday, November 08, 2008

Briefly on Sports Punditry

I've been following the English Premier League far more closely than in previous years, and one of the things I've noticed about the people who cover the sport is that there is a remarkable division of ability and talent among pundits and opinioneers over in England, and how that compares to American sports.  


For one thing, the play by play and in-game commentators are for the most part sensational.  I'm not talking about the FSC or GOLTV people who provide the commentary from a basement studio 8000 miles from the games they're covering.  I mean the English guys on site.  They know when to keep their mouths closed and let the game happen.  They know that they don't have to explain every last thing that is happening, because they know that they are on television and if you are watching you can figure some things out for yourself.  They have a vocabulary larger than that of a fifth grader.  They aren't, for the most part, former athletes who have some limited training in broadcasting, but rather professional broadcasters who know what they're doing.  There are no Tony Siragusas on hand.  The broadcasters are apparently praised and promoted for their intelligence and for being concise.  

Second, the studio show pundits in England are every bit as foolish as American sports pundits. They relentlessly focus on intangibles and personalities.  There are forced disputes.  There is talking over one another and extending statements to remain on camera longer.  The things that are wrong about American studio pundits are just as wrong in England.

But for the American viewer of the sport, it's not that hard to avoid those shows.  One can only watch games and follow stories online.  And that brings me to the best part about English football punditry: the written word.  

Football writers in England are incisive, smart, thoughtful and unafraid.  The strength of the press in England has created an entirely different relationship between the individuals involved in the sport and the journalists.  There isn't a symbiotic relationship.  Writers are tough enough to get stories without relying on the public relations people for various clubs.  And this provides a far greater freedom for the writers - but one that the writers don't need to abuse.  There isn't a need to write things that are inflammatory to draw attention.  For some reason, in England, the better writing and more intelligent takes draw attention, rather than the most salacious or offensive.  Now, of course, I'm painting in broad strokes (of course there are bad writers in the tabloids).  The thing is that I can find several really good national writers on English football.  I'm not sure I can find more than one or two American mainstream media writers whose pieces are salient.   

Here's a comparison.

Read this column on Harry Redknapp by Russell Brand.  Russell Brand is a comedian, a damned ridiculous character.  And this column is interesting, well-written and raises a few salient points on the true effect of a coach that apply to any sport.  Read through the Guardian's archives for other pieces by Brand.  They're all interesting, well-written and salient.  The odd thing about this is that this guy is a comedian.  He's not the dean of pundits over there, or anything even close to it.  Yet his columns are better than just about any national writer over here I can think of. 

Now go do a google search for sports columns by American comedian Jay Mohr.  I can't bear myself to look for them to link to them.  Russell Brand's column is what they have.  15 year old stale jokes, cliches and forced edginess is what we have.

Luckily there are writers over here that are trying to elevate the discourse.  A lot of them are in the blog world.  It's time for mainstream media outlets to realize that readers want better than what has been offered.  Coverage of American sports can be a whole lot better.  The dwindling readership and audience for several outlets should drive those outlets to do better.  

Read More...

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Pepsi Challenge: Mediocre-ish Teams Edition

Which team is better?


Team A:
5-2
1 win vs 1-AA/FCS opponent
Unbeaten in own conference
438 yards per game (20th nationally)
34 points per game (25th)
338 yards allowed per game (49th)
22 points allowed per game (49th)
113th toughest schedule according to Colley Ratings
97th toughest schedule according to GBE
Both losses to top-15 teams (one team is 7-1, the other is 7-2, both from major conferences, both on the road).
No wins over ranked opponents.

Team B:
5-2
1 win vs. 1-AA/FCS opponent.
Unbeaten in own conference
357 yards per game (69th)
24 points per game (71st)
312 yards allowed per game (34th)
15 points allowed per game (11th)
112th toughest schedule according to Colley Ratings
110th toughest schedule according to GBE
Both losses to teams at or near .500 (one is 4-4, the other 4-3, one from a major conference, the other a mid-major, both on the road)
No wins over ranked opponents

One team scores a lot more, the other allows a lot fewer points.  Neither team has played a decent schedule.  Neither team has proven that they can beat a good opponent, but one of these teams at least has only lost to very good teams.

Neither team is in line for the national title or anything, so this is more of an academic exercise than one that will determine anything all that important.

But Team B is currently 26th in both the AP and Coaches' Polls.  Team A barely gets a whiff of votes in either poll (no votes in the Coaches' poll, 1/13th the number of votes in the AP poll that Team B got).  And I've seen a few bloggers giving blogpoll votes to Team B.  

We're at the point in the season where what people think will happen ought to be eclipsed by the evidence of what has happened.  The evidence doesn't show any real difference between these two teams.

So why is it that people give the benefit of doubt to West Virginia (Team B) but don't give the same deference to Troy (Team A)?

Just askin'.


Read More...

Monday, October 20, 2008

Oh crap. My day is ruined.

Dolemite is dead.















"St. Peter wants to see you Dolemite"
"What the hell does that rat soup eating muthafucka want with me?"

Read More...

Pepsi Challenge: High Powered Offense Edition

Which team is better?


Team A:
7-0
2 wins vs. 1-AA/FBS opponents
45.9 points per game on offense (5th)
557 yards per game on offense (2nd)
21.1 points allowed per game on defense (43rd)
24.8 scoring margin
126th toughest schedule according to Colley Rankings
116th toughest schedule according to GBE
Against toughest opponent: home vs. 4-3 team, in overtime, by 6 points

Team B:
7-0
1 win vs. 1-AA/FBS opponent
56.6 points per game on offense (1st)
624 yards per game on offense (1st)
27.1 points allowed per game on defense (80th)
29.5 scoring margin
129th toughest schedule according to Colley Rankings.
120th toughest schedule according to GBE
Against toughest opponent: home vs. 4-3 team, by 35 points

Both teams have played against atrocious schedules.  One has played slightly worse opponents, but the other has played 2 lower division opponents.  Neither has played a ranked opponent.

One has a higher powered offense, while the other has a slightly better defense.  Both teams have one close win (6 points), but all of their other games were blowouts.

So...

Any idea why one team is ranked in the top 6 in the coaches' poll, while the other barely cracks the top 25?  Any idea why one team got 4 times as many points in the AP poll as the other?

What is it about Texas Tech (Team A) that is that much more impressive than Tulsa (Team B)?

Just askin'.

Read More...

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Rise by the machines.

Despite very few upsets this weekend, the Dawgs did move up a few notches on the ladder of the college football elite with the publication of the official BCS standings for the first time this year. The human voters feel no different about us. In the Harris and Coaches polls (the human polls used by the BCS), the Dawgs remained at #9 in both, same as last week. But with a little help from our artificially intelligent friends, the Dawgs sit at #7 in the only list that matters.

Vandy really boosted us in the computers. After the Tennessee game, two of the BCS computers -- Anderson & Hester and Colley Matrix -- each had us at #18. With the Commodores now in the Dawgs' wake, those same computers now have us at #8 and #7 respectively. A win at LSU could give an even bigger e-boost.

As much as Georgia was helped the computers, Florida, on the other hand, felt their sting. The Gators are at #6 in the Coaches and #7 in the Harris (and #5 in the AP), but the computers drop UF down to #10 in the BCS standings. I still think if either Florida or Georgia runs the table, beating an undefeated Bama in Atlanta, the chips will fall into place for an SEC east team in the Big One. We know at least one undefeated Big XII team is going down in Austin on Saturday. I like the Buckeyes' chances to spoil Penn State's run this week as well.

This four-week, flaming tightrope of a roadtrip is going to test the Dawgs like never before. Here's hoping Richt's patented road-focus is in high gear. Bring on the Cajun Cats!

Read More...

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Call Maury Povich.



Those vacuous, narrow-set eyes. That pursed-lip scowl, so cognizant of self-mediocrity. Those many telling chins. So familiar. Where have I seen them before? Could it be that Nick Stephens' recent promotion to starter was born not only of the pathetic performance of Jonathan Crompton, but also of the never-to-be-spoken love of a...father?



I envision a hot, sticky, east Tennessee night in the late '80s. A wisp of teased, crimped blonde hair across the barroom catches the corner of Phil's eye. He looks up from his tall beer mug and near-empty box of Krispy Kremes. With desire enflamed by her jail-orange sweatshirt, cut wide at the neck and draped below one shoulder, he wipes the glaze from his chin and makes his approach. Soon all control is lost in a breathy fog of heaving thighs and guttural bellows of hillbilly ecstasy.

She never spoke of the encounter, and Johnny Joe Stephens raised young Nick as his own, deep in the heart of Texas. Still, a long-repressed paternal pride later became a scholarship offer, and now, the opportunity to start under center. Just like his lustful mother, this bastard is going to be on his back all night Saturday, and his hefty biological father will be out of a job come Sunday.

Go you hairy Bulldawgs!!!

Read More...

Rivalries, Misery, Hatred and Hideous Orange: A Memoir

There's something a little strange about being a Georgia football fan that a lot of our rivals don't quite understand. It's the sticky issue of having multiple hated rivals, but not one that is head and shoulders above of the rest in terms of the emotions raised by such a team. Some teams have just one hated rival, and nothing else really comes too close to that: Auburn fans hate Alabama worse than anyone else. South Carolina fans hate Clemson, and vice versa. Ohio State hates Michigan and vice versa. Some teams might have two hated rivals: Tennessee fans hate Alabama and Alabama fans hate Tennessee most of all, though each school does have a secondary hated opponent (Florida and Auburn, respectively) that doesn't quite approach their primary nemesis.  Kansas hates Missouri first and foremost, but each has a second rival (Kansas State, Illinois). Some teams have one hated rival, but are considered the one hated rival by a host of other teams - the perfect example is Texas and Oklahoma, who hate each other worst of all, but are considered the most hated rival by other teams, like Texas A&M, Oklahoma State and Nebraska. There are even ladders of hatred: Texas is considered the most hated rival by Oklahoma fans, while Oklahoma is considered the most hated rival by Nebraska fans, while Nebraska is considered the most hated rival by Colorado fans, while Colorado is considered the most hated rival by Colorado State fans, while Colorado State is considered the most hated rival by Wyoming fans. The point is that for most fans of a particular football school, there is usually one clear answer to the question of who is the fanbase's most hated rival. 


But Georgia is different. If you ask 10 Georgia fans who the most hated rival for the program is, you might get 5 different answers. And the answers may be perfectly valid, but for different reasons.  

Sometimes it's geography that causes Georgia fans to hate a particular team. If you ask a Georgia fan in Columbus who the most hated rival is, there's an excellent chance he'll say Auburn. He might cite that the Auburn-Georgia series is the longest-running in the deep south, and it's always been a close rivalry (over 100 games and there's like a 3 point margin between the two in total points scored). But the real reason is that Auburn is just down the road from Columbus and a lot of the people this Dawg fan is friends with, lives near and works with probably went to Auburn (or are sidewalk fans). So Auburn is the biggest rival to this guy, because he has to hear all about War Damn Eagle all year long.  Same with a Georgia fan who lives in Dalton or Calhoun - they're probably more likely to tell you that Tennessee is the most hated rival because they live near Vol fans and get sick of hearing about it. Or a Georgia fan from Hartwell and is surrounded by Clemson fans. Or a Georgia fan in Valdosta who has to listen to bandwagon-jumping Florida fans. Or even a fan from Atlanta who took AP Physics in high school with a bunch of nerds who, for some bizarre reason, like Georgia Tech.  There might be one or two fans in Augusta who even think South Carolina is the most hated rival, but they're probably suffering from odd wind shifts from the Savannah River Site.  

Personally, I think timing matters more than geography. See, a real Georgia fan develops his hate early, in the formative years of his fanhood. And early learned hatred never leaves. I say this as the father of a young child - I know that teaching to hate requires patience and repetition. But I digress... timing matters. The period in which a person became a Dawg fan directly affects where their hatred will be directed. If someone became a Dawg fan in the midst of a long losing streak to Tech, like some of the really really really old Dawg fans, that hatred never leaves. If someone went to UGA in the early 1980s, they may very well still hate Clemson more than anyone else, because of the 1981 and 1982 games. Even the fact that we don't play Clemson annually cannot bury that pure, unadulterated hatred. And just a single year can be a line of demarcation for hatred. If you became a Dawg fan in the 1980-83 period, you might hate Clemson most, but if you became a Dawg fan in the 1984-88 period, you are probably in the camp that hates Auburn most of all.  

Florida might be the one team that isn't really tied to a time period.  Most Georgia fans hate Florida a lot, even though we owned them for long stretches. There might be a spike in Florida hatred among fans who came of age in the Spurrier period, but it was also during that period that our hatred of Tennessee emerged - and we also suffered a few ignominious (and subsequently vacated) losses to Georgia Tech (the Jasper Sanks "fumble", Tech fans wrecking our hedges).  

The 90s were a tough time to decide on a rival. Mainly because for the majority of the time, Georgia sucked. Well, not exactly sucked (we had 2 good seasons and a few other decent seasons), as much as Georgia was totally irrelevant and uninspiring, while competitors for "most hated rival" all mattered. And it just so happened that this was my personal coming-of- age as a Georgia fan. 

In the early 90s there was a Georgia Tech team that won probably the least impressive national title in history. Seriously, if one of (a) one loss, 5th down-beneficiary and phantom-block-on-Rocket's-return Colorado or (b) a Georgia Tech team that was an unbeaten team that actually played for a tie and whose best win was over 8-4 Virginia has to win a title, but unbeaten 2004 Auburn gets nothing, don't we have to place certain value on how good a title was? Then Bobby Ross left and Tech descended into terribleness with Bill Lewis, and we won 7 straight, leaving many of us to wonder whether lopsidedness affected whether there was an actual rivalry. But then George O'Leary, what with his Nobel Prize in Economics, 6 Honorary PhDs, Ponce de Leon Rd. McDonald's Employee of the Month Award and Order of Lenin (according to his resume), figured out how to take roided linemen from New Jersey and midget quarterbacks and turn them into a decent team (the trick: don't go to class!). That and hilariously inept referees led to a couple of the worst defeats I have ever experienced. Hating Tech became a lot easier in the late 90s. But you always knew in a 12 round bout they couldn't hang with you, even if they got a few punches in every couple of rounds.  And further, it's only a little fun to beat up on nerds.  After a while, no matter who you are, you start to feel a little guilty. 

Auburn was another story in the 90s. There were pros and cons to hating Auburn in the 90s. On the one hand, Auburn plundered the state for good recruits and there was a pretty good streak of Auburn beating us in Sanford Stadium. 1997: coming off of a ridiculous upset of Florida, ranked as high as anyone could think, on a day so cold my mother and aunt sneaked a full pint of scotch into the game (no flask or ziplocks, just dropped the bottle in her purse and expected the security guards not to suspect middle aged women to pull a stunt like that), Daymeune Craig rips the defense apart, ruining any chance of an SEC title game appearance. 1999: Jasper Sanks can't use his massive ass to move the ball 3 feet with 9 blockers in front of him, and Mark Richt shows that he never had to manage the clock at his previous job. Such fun days. On the other hand, there were some pretty good moments for Dawg fans against Auburn in the 90s. We end their on-probation winning streak by refusing to unpile and line up. In '96, we win the SEC's first ever overtime game with a hail Mary at the end of regulation and a well-rested Robert Edwards annihilating the tired Tiger defense in OT.  Later in the decade it was kind of fun to watch them fumble around with Tater Tot. All in all, there were highs and lows, but Auburn wasn't exactly a team that my generation of Georgia fans truly loathed. They were kind of like us - sometimes OK, sometimes mediocre, usually dysfunctional, talented but oddly coached. It's too exhausting to hate something so much like yourself, so Auburn isn't the choice for most hated rival for a 90s era Dawg fan (unless you live in Columbus or Alabama, and then it's acceptable).

Clemson we only played a few times in the 90s, and the only memorable game was the day the Dawgs upset Clemson and the Braves clinched the NL West, going from Worst to First. Also, that win on October 5, 1991 was the last win over a ranked team in Sanford Stadium for the rest of the decade. Really. Nope, I'm not kidding. Zero home wins over ranked opponents between 1992 and 1999. That's how awesome it was to be a Dawg fan in the 1990s. So, anyway, Clemson's a good rival for the old school Dawgs, but it doesn't really work with people in my generation. 

South Carolina shouldn't really be considered among the others on this list. Regardless, in some ways the 1990s were the Golden Era of Gamecock football. They won their first ever bowl game. Steve Taneyhill had the sweetest hairstyle this side of the Pittsburgh Penguins' second line. They even had a winless season - and it takes real effort to have one of them! The Cocks were always annoying mosquitoes, but never enough to truly hate. Yes, the 2000 game was the definition of misery, but few Dawg fans hate South Carolina over that (plenty of bile is reserved for Quincy Carter and Jim Donnan in that one).  

But that leaves us to the hard ones: Tennessee and Florida. Both treated us like their whipping boys. Both became national media darlings for the games against each other and the stars who played for both, while we were out in the wilderness. Both gave me personally harrowing memories.  

For all this time, in my gut, Florida was the choice. I hated them purely and with white heat. Their offensive arrogance drove me mad. I never understood how it was that their receivers would be 10 yards away from our defenders. In those rare close games, if there was a time for a key penalty or turnover, it would always go in their favor. '92: the timely timeout that prevented Zeier's touchdown pass. But for the majority of seasons, the games were never in doubt. I was always negative on Florida, before I went to Georgia, because I particularly didn't like the state itself. Plastic and pastel still turn my stomach.  But in 1995, my freshman year, dislike turned to outright and open hatred. I was a pledge in a fraternity, and as is often the case, it is the pledges' duty to clean up after band parties or other social events the following morning. In 1994 and 1995, the old Gator Bowl was being renovated for the Jaguars, so Georgia and Florida played the games on their campuses. 1995 was the first visit to Athens for the Gators in something like 50 years. And though Florida was heavily favored, Georgia fans turned out in droves to see the World's Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party come to Athens.  To this day, I still have never seen tailgating like there was on that afternoon. More food, more liquor, more people than ever before or since - and though I think Georgia fans have been steadily improving over the last 13 years at tailgating, this one day was an aberration. And then the game came, and it was an abomination. Florida could do no wrong, Georgia could do no right. And then Steve Spurrier thought he'd like to get some revenge for the beatings he took at the hands of the Dawgs when he played for Florida, and thus left in his future Heisman winner in the waning moments of a blowout to score on a trick play, just to say he was the coach of the team that scored 50 on Georgia in Sanford Stadium. So out of the stadium streamed 80,000+, to return to their potable tailgates and drown their sorrows in that sweet embrace of brown liquid. And just as the tens of thousands were drinking to forget, all of a sudden a baseball team from just down the road gave them a reason to drink to celebrate.  The Atlanta Braves won the World Series that very same night. And a town full of people already annihilated by alcohol and Florida's football team turned up another bottle, just to feel good about something. The next morning, however, would not be enjoyable. I cannot remember if it had rained overnight, but it seemed as if it had because of the way things had melted, spread out and settled. I cannot remember if it was actually an oddly warm October morning, but I believe I was wearing a t-shirt which got very wet. Sunday morning, tailgate cleanup.  The parking lot of the fraternity house was covered in a festering sea of an inch-deep curdling stew, which was primarily cole slaw but also included such delightful ingredients as crab dip, raw ground beef, bourbon, dog feces, soaking wet tortilla chips, broken beer bottles, and chicken bones. This is not something you would like to pick up at any time, but at 7:00 a.m. the morning after drinking until 3:30, this was particularly a bad time. We had around 25 guys working on the mess. It took until about 11 a.m. We used shovels to pick up the leftover slaw stew. We used hoses. We threw up as we cleaned. We were soaking wet, covered in filth. The topic of conversation that was first on our minds: how bad did Dawgs looked yesterday. With a handful of broken glass and chicken bones, I thought right there, that I would forever hate Florida with all of my might and with no other approaching the level of loathing I harbored for that team. They took away the purity and enjoyment of watching football, and replaced it with a memory I would always carry: a blowout followed by the most disgusting job outside of a peepshow. Florida took the fun out of football that day.  In fact, it wasn't until the next year at Auburn (the overtime game) that I would enjoy football again. The next year Texas Tech came to Athens on a rainy Saturday, and all I could do was look out at the same parking lot and think about how disgusting the cleanup would be for those current pledges. I didn't go to the game, and I don't even remember watching it. And all that time, Florida was en route to their national title. We were losing to Southern Miss at home and suffering through a new coach that might not have been up to the task in Division 1-A. This was malaise. This was not what football was supposed to be. This is how that mid-90s juggernaut Florida team made me feel.  

Worst of all, each year, at the end of October or the beginning of November, I start to feel that way again. This is because Florida has continued to punish Georgia fans since before that day in 1995 and long afterward. I watched Terrence Edwards' dropped pass that potentially cost Georgia a title shot in 2002. I heard the boos that night, but I didn't think it was his fault. It wasn't just Edwards' failure to send neurological signals to his hands to close them at the precise moment. It was a massive weight that every Dawg carried with him, and we all put it on his shoulders. We all knew the unbeaten run that year was too good to be true. We all had too many scars from the previous decade or so. We saw too much talent squandered. We saw too many mental mistakes taken advantage of by Florida. We knew that the moment was too big for us. We saw the golden ring, but we weren't ready to reach out far enough to grab it. And we walked out of the stadium with clenched fists, wondering when it would be our time.

Yes, we had a few moments. 1997 was a glorious afternoon, where Robert Edwards, Mike Bobo and Hines Ward gave us a taste of forbidden fruit, if only for a day. I remember when Robert Edwards turned the corner and ran toward the endzone for the clinching score (even though Georgia had been ahead by 13 or so, we knew Florida and karma could strike at any second). I don't remember him actually scoring, because I was standing in that endzone, the open end of the stadium where, in those days, oddly swaying and not-exactly-sturdy bleachers rose. As soon as Edwards looked like he was about to score, the entire weight of those endzone bleachers rose in the air at once, and came down in a spot slightly in front of where they took off. Several thousand of us ended up in a pile, a perfect, orgasmic pile. It was amazing. But walking out of the stadium, we merely celebrated the upset. We didn't think the series had changed for good. We just saw what was possible, not what should be expected. And we showed that over the next 4 years, losing games we could have won. We squandered three games against Ron Zook, incredibly.  2003 saw Chris Leak drive the field to take what must have seemed as rightfully his. In 2004, our win felt not just expected, but almost undeserved - as if it was Florida whose ineptitude allowed us to win, rather than because we took the game from them. 2005 will go down as a "what might have been", thanks to DJ Shockley's knee injury the previous week against Arkansas.

It wasn't until 2006 where we actually looked like a team that felt like it belonged on the same field as Florida. You may think I meant to write 2007, when the celebration in the end zone supposedly turned the tide in the series. No, I meant 2006. 2006 was a magical year for Florida. They ended up winning the national title. Fortune smiled upon them in half of their games, particularly South Carolina. But, for some strange reason, a freshman-quarterbacked Georgia team was right there, in the game, potentially with a chance to drive the field and win it (if not for an unlucky and accidental facemask penalty). For the only the second time in my fanhood, 1997 being the other, did Georgia enter the Florida game a decisive underdog, but somehow kept up with the Gators.  We looked like we belonged, even if the final score didn't go our way.  It was 2006, not 2007 that turned the tide. And the last two years may have made a difference in how I feel about the Gators. I still hate them with a white hot passion. I hate Urban Meyer's sanctimonious ego every bit as much as Steve Spurrier's smirking while spanking us. But instead of dreading Florida and expecting them to pound us into submission, now I expect two good teams to collide and neither to have a dramatic psychological advantage. Our team believes they can play with the Gators, and I believe in the team. It's still hatred, but it's not a hopeless hatred. And the hopelessness, I think, is what gave Florida a slight edge when it came to me absolutely hating a rival. Without hope, all I had was hatred. What purpose does hatred serve when there is hope?

Which brings me to Tennessee...

I never felt hopeless against Tennessee, I just hated them. In some ways, that is logically worse - since Georgia wasn't very successful against Tennessee, the fact that I thought we had a chance going into almost every single game but still failed should have made myself feel worse about Tennessee than Florida. But hatred isn't a logical emotion.  Tennessee got my hopes up and crushed them. Florida never got my hopes up, just drowned me in depression, before and after the game. So here's the question: if I am no longer hopeless about Florida, and the bulk of my hatred of them came from that place, do I still hate Florida more than Tennessee? Perhaps I should take another, more rational (rational hatred - now there's a concept I can get behind) look at the Volunteers, and think about whether I've been hating the wrong shade of orange all this time. 

Georgia didn't play Tennessee every year before the additions of South Carolina and Arkansas to the SEC, and that affects the rivalry in the eyes of many long-time Dawg fans. Sure, we all remember Herschel running over Bill Bates in 1980 and Larry Munson screaming "My God a Freshman!," but there's not all that much history to the series before the last 15 years or so.  However, the last 15 years or so include my personal coming-of-age as a Dawg fan. So while Tennessee as a rival might not stand up against Tech, Florida or Auburn in the grand scheme of things, to me the Tennessee story is plenty rich - and it started with a personal story.

1995 was my freshman year at Georgia. This was back in the glory days before the school was on the semester program. Under the quarter system, Fall session didn't start until toward the end of September, and Spring session continued all the way through May (which, as an aside, was by far the best month of the year in Athens - warm weather, less clothes, midterms are over, exams not yet begun, the NCAA tennis tournament is in town... I'm getting pissed-off-nostalgic now, so I digress). In 1995, Vince Dooley had given Ray Goff an ultimatum regarding the "significant improvement" of the football team. Goff got the message, and in preseason camp he had taken the best athlete on the team, Robert Edwards, and moved him from defensive back to running back, and further restructured the offense around a strong running game - back to the successful system of the 80's and in direct response to the aerial attacks preferred by Florida and Tennessee at that time. The opener against South Carolina was promising. South Carolina, if I recall, was actually favored (or at least the line was close) and had a decent team returning. Robert Edwards changed things entirely. His afternoon was incredible. Toughness, breakaway speed, and a nose for the endzone. That afternoon he scored 5 touchdowns and tallied a ridiculous amount of yards. He looked like the stars of old, the guys who made UGA (and not Southern Cal) known as Tailback U in the 80s and early 90s. The next weekend against Peyton Manning and Tennessee looked to be a tougher task, but Georgia fans were pretty excited to go to Neyland Stadium with their new-found talent. And Edwards didn't disappoint. The first half was exhilarating. Edwards carried the ball with confidence and toughness, breaking loose in the secondary multiple times. It seemed like the question was "how are they going to stop us" rather than "how are we going to stop them". We dominated time of possession, keeping Manning on the sidelines. Then, on a long run down the right hand side of the field and with the endzone in sight, Edwards was tackled awkwardly. He got up and tried to stay in the game, even carrying the ball a few more times. Then halftime came and the bad news: Edwards had a broken bone and wouldn't return. The shooting star had fizzled out.  Georgia stayed in the game, but the running game faltered and the strategy of running downhill and working the clock failed. Manning led a comeback and the game was tied. Georgia was hanging tough and had the ball, using short passes and weak runs to get to about midfield.  With time short and facing a third down, Georgia needed to complete a pass to burn more clock and get into better field goal position. The pass hit Brice Hunter in the numbers and fell to the ground. Tennessee got the ball back, drove with Manning's skill, and Jeff Hall drilled a long field goal to send Georgia home with a loss.  Edwards would be out for the season, Georgia's confidence would disappear. It was a thoroughly depressing result. And I was an immature 18 year old who didn't react well to losses. I watched the game with a group of close high school friends. We all were going to away to college that week and it was pretty much the last time we'd see each other together for a while. A little more than half were going to Georgia, so most of us were rooting for the Dawgs. But not all. One of my best friends was on her way to UCLA, and though she would become a Bruin, her family were all Volunteer fans. We were close friends and she was on her way across the continent. After Hall hit the field goal to win the game, I think I just turned, didn't say anything, got in my car and drove home. I spent the rest of the night finishing up packing and loading the car. The next afternoon, I had moved into Russell Hall.  I didn't even say goodbye to some of my closest friends. That loss had affected me and I didn't respond like I should have, and it hurt friendships. I blame my own immaturity for that, but it was also hard not to think things might've been different had Edwards not gotten hurt or had Hunter caught that first down. 

But those thoughts were only temporal. Over time, I started to realize that while the '95 loss to Tennessee was something I didn't handle well and it was bad for me personally, it may have been a blessing for the Georgia program. If Georgia wins that game and Edwards stays healthy, Georgia may have won more than the 6 games it did that season, and Ray Goff might have been given a longer tenure at a job he simply wasn't capable of performing at that high a level. The '95 Tennessee game adds to my hatred of the Vols, but only in a personal, immature and stupidly selfish way. Realistically, it was a tough loss but ultimately not that terrible for the program.

I have little recollection of the 1996 game. That should tell you how insignificant Georgia football was in Donnan's first year. We had already lost to Southern Miss and South Carolina, and eked by a weak Texas Tech team. We knew it was a rebuilding year, and we knew Tennessee was good. I think they threw the ball all over us, but I don't know for certain. This game surely didn't make me hate Tennessee all that much more, except for one thing. I remember there being a lot of Vol fans at this game, and I remember them singing Rocky Top all game long and all the way out of the stadium. Rocky Top echoes very loudly down the North Side ramps from the upper deck and it is annoying. This was the first experience I had with this sensation, but it would not be the last. Also, I noticed that Tennessee fans had, in their hands, pre-printed fans or placards in bright orange that had the number "6" on them. They had printed out these cards knowing full well that they'd win the game. No worry of bad karma. It was that certain. I'd see those same cards in 1998. 

1997 was my first visit to Knoxville. I boarded a bus at 6:00 a.m. I reached into a ice-filled trash can and cracked open a Pabst Blue Ribbon at 6:45 a.m.  I drank Natural Light at my fraternity's UT chapter most of the afternoon. I got to the game early, shockingly. My seats were in the endzone, and pretty close to the field. Tennessee's players were stretching close enough to yell at.  We yelled at them. We thought we had a pretty decent team thus far that season. We were unbeaten. We had just pounded Mississippi State 47-0.  We thought we were ready to take the next step. Tennessee was loaded - senior Peyton Manning was a Heisman candidate, Jamal Lewis was their young back who had shown flashes of talent. My buddy Woodrow was sitting next to me - a big follower of recruiting. The previous year, Jim Donnan had made the decision to recruit Jasper Sanks out of Columbus - supposedly a huge talent, but with suspect grades and personal issues - rather than Jamal Lewis out of Douglass High in Atlanta. For the entire warmup period, Woodrow (with a booming baritone) bellowed "WE DIDN'T WANT YOU JAMAAAAAAAAALLLL!!!!! WE GOT JASPER COMIN'!!!!!!! WE DON'T NEED YOU JAMAAAAAAAAAAAL!!!". At one point, I believe Jamal Lewis looked up in our direction. He then proceeded to completely and unabashedly sodomize our defense. I think he had 4000 yards and eleventy touchdowns. Jamal Lewis had more yards that day than Jasper Sanks had pounds when he finally showed up the next year. Woodrow knew it was his fault too. On I think the 22nd touchdown Jamal Lewis ran for, coming right at our endzone, Woodrow hurled his nearly-full enormous Beam and Coke towards the field. It didn't make it.  Immediately two security guards came right up to our row and pointed, incorrectly at The General, who was sitting with us. The General was hilariously (and honestly) defiant. He stood inches away from the guard asking him if he threw the cup, pointed his index finger and yelled "NOOOO WAAAYY!!! NOOOO WAAAAYY!! NOOOO WAAYYYY!!" about as many times as Jamal Lewis scored that afternoon. Many of you may already know this about The General: there are times when he is Unabomber Insane. He has these blue eyes that somehow become bunsen burners, sending torching heat at you. Then his face and neck turn bright red. And also, he looks very much like he is, carefully, thoroughly and with the most excruciating pain accompanying, going to disembowel you. The guard walked away. Neither Woodrow nor The General was ejected. I was, all of a sudden, sober. Tennessee scored again. We left, returned to the fraternity house, and I was convinced to haze some Tennessee pledges (which I have to say, I didn't particularly know how to do). The Tennessee fraternity had some great band playing and we were convinced we were going to win, so the bus didn't plan on leaving until something like 2:00 a.m.  After the game, we were not all that happy about this. Vol fans were celebrating their win over us, and then Florida proceeds to crap the bed against LSU, opening the door for UT to go to the SEC title game. I believe we returned to Athens just under 24 hours after we left. It was a completely memorable and completely disastrous day.  And while I think the stories were fun, I will say that watching a guy from Georgia that we could've recruited do that to us did make me hate Tennessee a bit more. Also, seeing Neyland and all that orange in person is something you don't forget. It burns into your cornea. And that makes you hate them.

During my senior year at Georgia, perhaps the greatest lesson I learned was that we, as Georgia football fans, never learn from our previous miseries. Year after year, it seemed we were always overly optimistic about the new additions to our team, and overly dire in the losses suffered by other teams. We're losing a senior QB who just put in one of the greatest passing performances ever against Wisconsin in the Outback Bowl? Who cares? We can definitely replace him with a guy who has been out of football for 3 years! We just lost one of the most physically gifted running backs in a decade in Robert Edwards? Relax! Jasper Sanks is coming! Mid-90s Georgia fans were supremely talented at convincing ourselves to expect greatness. And when something even subtly hinted that our delusions could become true, like a road win against a then-top-5-ranked LSU team (ignore their subsequent 4-7 record and coach firing), look out for Dawg fans to become flat earth believers. And so we arrive at the 1998 Tennessee game. We have deluded ourselves into thinking we're a top 10 team, with a freshman quarterback in Quincy Carter who is destined for greatness. We have deluded ourselves into thinking that the Tennessee team that had been killing us annually was mostly the result of Peyton Manning. We have deluded ourselves into thinking that his replacement, Tee Martin, would shrink from the big stage. We have deluded ourselves into thinking that the injury suffered by Jamal Lewis the previous week meant that Tennessee had nobody to run the ball (because we have collectively forgotten their other highly talented backs). We have deluded ourselves into thinking that the fact that College Gameday had come to Athens and built their set on our Tate Center meant that we had truly arrived. We have deluded ourselves into thinking that by packing Sanford Bridge from end-to-end just so the Sportscenter live throw to the Gameday crew on Friday evening would look cool, our team would become a national power. The next day reality reared its ugly head. Georgia's typical red zone inefficiency showed itself. Quincy Carter debuted his trademark "you know what the one thing we really don't need to do here? Throw an interception!". Tennessee apparently had depth at running back and Tee Martin made no mistakes. And that was that. We all believed we would win that game. We all thought we were the better team. We were all wrong. And being wrong kind of sucks. Tennessee fans sang Rocky Top and it echoed down the North stand's ramps. They carried placards that had the number 8 on them, preprinted. Bastards. That fall, I was living in the fraternity house and 6 of us shared a common area. 5 of us were seniors and trying to live up the last of the glory days. We had pretty much given up on the frat-tastic social scene and instead we were just trying to have fun, no matter how ridiculous. After the Wyoming game, we hosted a crazy latenight where everyone ended up with costumes on and women danced with toy guns against greek columns.  Before the game, we expected something similar to happen after we beat the Vols. Well, neither happened. We wanted to take our minds off the game and tie one on. That, however, was not possible.  The year before we had taken a bus to Knoxville and hung out with the UT chapter of our fraternity. This year, those guys returned the favor. And camped out. They took over our living area to watch Florida play. They did not leave. We drank, hoping they would become less obnoxious and intruding. Didn't happen. We couldn't outright tell these morons to get out, because one of our roommates was trying to hook up with one of these terrible Vol fan girls that came down. Eventually my roommate Dr. Tealpants ordered some chinese food, and the loveseeking roommate realized that the Vol girl was terrible. The next thing I know, the Vol girls are in the driveway in some Sebring convertible, blasting a "Cotton Eyed Joe"-like remix of Rocky Top. Dr. Tealpants, the soon-to-be Mrs. Dr. Tealpants and said loveseeking roommate responded to the music by hurling moo goo gai pan at them from an upstairs window. Earlier in the night Tealpants and I had thrown tailgating chairs in trees and drank Mimosas, because it was all we had left in the cooler. Another memorable and disastrous night. The Vol fans were imposing enough to make me hate Tennessee just a little bit more, but the game itself made me hate myself and Georgia fans as a whole - because we truly believed things could change.

I entered law school at Georgia in 1999. The first year of law school is supposed to scare you and make you work harder than you ever have and learn a lot about yourself and become a better critical thinker and indoctrinate you into the most miserable life you could possibly foresee (and love it!). I worked harder than I ever had (though not as hard as I eventually would), but I also thought I wouldn't fall for the fear of failure law school imposes on so many.  Or, to be more specific, it wasn't until after I got my first semester grades that I thought I could get by without fear. One way I convinced myself that I wouldn't become a paralyzed 1L was by continuing to live it up on football weekends, and when my buddy Napoleon IV had an extra ticket and a place to stay (with another friend at UT Law), I jumped at the chance. I was leaving right after Professor Brussack's Civil Procedure class on Friday afternoon.  Because I had been packing for the trip and running other errands I normally did on the weekend, I did not prepare for class. Brussack only called on one person each day, so it was a 1/75 chance I'd get called on, and regardless, I was on the road to see the Dawgs in an hour anyway. Of course, Brussack called on me. It was one of those personal jurisdiction cases (I think Burger King or International Volkswagen or something) and I was an embarrassing failure. I tried to be funny as I misstated the facts and completely missed the point of the case. I  failed at that too.  Apparently personal jurisdiction isn't good fodder for comedy. Nonetheless, I was on the road.  We got to Knoxville, grilled out and hit the strip. Here's where things got strange. We end up in kind of dive bar somewhere (can't remember names now). I'm not hammered - just drinking beer to save up for tailgating. Further, I'm wearing (a) a white polo shirt with jeans and (b) a bright Tennessee-orange colored CB&T hat. There is nothing readily apparent, save for having all my teeth, that would reveal me to be a Georgia fan and not a Tennessee fan. I even had an orange hat on! Nonetheless, and for no reason at all, a Vol fan decides he would like to fight me.
Probably my animalistic sexual appeal to rocky-soil women. He shoves me, asks me why I thought Georgia fans could drink in a "Vol Bar" (no lie). I respond by saying "well, yeah, I am a Georgia fan, but how did you know?". I may have used that teeth line, which would have merited his actions, but I cannot recall. The dude was bigger than me, and I have never been in a fight, being a mild mannered law student by day and a dashing raconteur to the ladies by night. Things did not look good. Next thing I know, out of nowhere, the one guy I knew from UGA who will probably end up jailed for murder shows up and asks what the problem is. Things calmed down. I remained confused as to why I was targeted, or even why someone would want to prevent anyone else from enjoying libations. We ended up leaving and I think we drank in an Applebees or Chili's or some other famous Knoxville watering hole. That evening made me hate Tennessee a lot. And the game wasn't much better. It rained. It rained a lot. I was very wet. Tennessee got a lead, we kind of came back, and then just when we thought we had some kind of a chance, UT returned our kickoff for a TD and the game was over. We left, and walked for what seemed like 50 miles in the rain. Then we ended up at Krystal. The rain stopped. I saw a drunk driver rear end a cop car (awesome). At like 3 in the morning I think I watched The Big Lebowski for the first time. Almost got into a fight, Dawgs got beat. SEC title hopes over. This weekend was perhaps the peak of my Tennessee hatred.  

The 2000 Georgia football team was the team Jim Donnan had waited 55 years to coach. And he was absolutely right. Something like 15 players on that defense ended up playing in the NFL. The only problem was that he was the coach. South Carolina had already pretty much ruined our season. No, check that. Quincy Carter and whoever called the same play for 4 of 5 interceptions in Columbia had already pretty much ruined our season. We were still outrageously talented, but we had little to play for. However, this season was not a vintage Volunteer team. Georgia played boring football, took advantage of Tennessee miscues and ended up winning in a thoroughly uninvigorating fashion. That did not stop Georgia students, myself included, from rushing the field and tearing down the goalposts. Yes, we were that starved for success that we stormed the field for a win over a 2-2, unranked opponent in a game we were favored and wasn't even that thrilling. That's how much we needed to feel success. It had been 15 years and 9 games since we'd beaten Tennessee. Running on the field and tearing down the goalposts wasn't the cool, or even the appropriate, thing to do, but catharsis rarely is cool or appropriate. Pieces of the goalposts went off in various directions, dragging up Lumpkin to go downtown. I ended up back at my old fraternity house, proudly wearing a "Yes, I'm a creepy old guy no longer in college" grin. We finally got that dance party we wanted in '98. Music was blasting, people were dancing. And the next thing you know, one arm of the goalposts arrived. We started dancing with the goalpost over our heads. It was a weird football-centric conga line. I cannot imagine ever having that happen to me again, but what happened next probably will never happen to anyone ever again. A buddy of ours, who once almost got a DUI on a riding lawnmower, decided that with the goalpost right there, it would be a good idea to fire up a chainsaw and cut the post up.  To give everyone a little souvenir.  I was absolutely annihilated, along with everyone else, but seeing the rainbow of sparks fly when the chainsaw metal hit the metal of the post provided an incredible moment of clarity. This was such a bad idea that, as drunk as I was, I thought it was a bad idea. But what was I going to do, stop the drunk guy using a chainsaw to cut through metal? So he started cutting. I did not know this before, but the goalposts are actually hollow inside. They're basically a long, metal PVC pipe. Also, the hollow area on the inside is shockingly close to the diameter of your standard koozy.  And so as our friend cut up pieces, people started using their souvenir small ring of the goalpost to hold their beers. I am not kidding about this. It most certainly happened. Or at least I hallucinated it. I would appreciate corroboration, but I never got a goalpost koozy. Maybe it was all a dream. No. I am pretty sure it happened. An outrageous night. And the outpouring of unnecessary emotion goes to show: we all really hated Tennessee, and we were going to celebrate, even if they weren't that good.

2001: New coach, new starting quarterback, new everything. Low expectations. 2001 was the year Georgia fans learned their lesson. We all got too excited the previous year, and when we went 8-4 and had to play in some bowl called the Oahu Classic, which may or may not have actually been a legitimate bowl game, we all took our lumps. The lesson: never again would we overhype our team... until the next time we overhype our team. But not this year. We all had reasonably low expectations. And that's why, even though I was a frequently-drunk, mostly lazy third-year law student, I made no plans to travel to Knoxville to see our young pups play against a better (on paper, at least) Tennessee team. Also, if I wasn't going to be able to drink in a "Vol Bar", I wasn't going to go.  So I watched it on TV with my roommates hungover from the previous night. If my memory serves, the air in the room smelled bad, but that may be because the air in our den always smelled horrible. There may have been a small nugget tray there. Nobody was drinking anything by gatorade and flat coke.  Regardless, it was an early game.  Georgia played pretty well, especially on defense early on. We exchanged punts, took advantage of field position and used some special teams skills to take a lead. Tennessee had the ball with about a minute to go and wasn't looking too potent, but my roommates and I had seen just one stinking 1 Georgia win over the Vols in our 6 years in Athens (and even before), so we knew the other shoe could drop. Then one of those Travises (Henry or Stephens, I can't remember) catches a screen pass and takes it all the way in for a TD and the lead. We get the ball back with like 45 seconds left and down 4.  Some of us may have stopped watching already.  We know that we have no chance in Neyland Stadium.  They stupidly squib kick it to us, so we have the ball in decent field position. Then our unproven QB starts hitting our tight ends over the middle. We've all given up, but then we look up and we have the ball on like the 4 yard line with 6 seconds or so to go. How did this happen? Who is this team? Then Verron Haynes sneaks out of the backfield unmarked and Greene gets it to him. We just smashed their faces. In our living room, we didn't know what to do. We weren't drunk (still hungover). Only dudes there, and not many of us. We yelled for a minute, but then when we stopped it was really quiet. Like, too quiet. Were we supposed to hug each other or just exchange high fives?  We had all this adrenaline in us for a minute and then didn't know what to do. We all just kind of looked at each other. We'd never experienced something like that sober and inhibited. The Dagger and I went outside and threw a frisbee for a few minutes and then maybe played a game of foosball. Weird. I think we started drinking again not long afterward.  We had lost 9 in a row to Tennessee, and now we'd won 2 in a row. It felt weird. It felt good. The manner of beating them felt really good.  We gave them the thought that they still owned us, and then we took that thought away. This was comeuppance. Maybe not 9 years worth, but still pretty damn good comeuppance.

In 2002 Georgia fans were stuck with a difficult choice about their own optimism. Should we think positively about our team, since we have just about everyone that matters back and our coaches look much better than they did under Donnan? But if we do hype things up, will that make us feel worse when they inevitably lose? It left us in a precarious position. Georgia fans, especially after the trauma of the 90s, are not particularly good at having confidence. So when Tennessee arrived in Athens with a team that, for the first time in a long time on paper, was a real step below Georgia, what were we to think? We'd won a game we probably shouldn't have in Columbia and we'd looked really good in the other games. What if we were the real deal? What if this was the season that all those miserable days behind us had been building us up for? My old roommate and I, I believe, took different approaches to this team, and the result of the Tennessee game showed it. The Dagger waited for the other shoe to drop. He was sure that Tennessee was going to beat us and start a real slide. I didn't feel great about Tennessee, but I thought we should win the game. And further, I thought the past failures didn't mean this year there would be one (at least with Tennessee, with Florida I thought it was hopeless). So when Georgia played a solid and steady game, taking advantage of Tennessee miscues and inadequacies and ended up winning a relatively uneventful game, I wasn't all that surprised. I thought we were on Tennessee's level - we'd beaten them 2 straight and the previous year was a brutal way for them to lose. The Dagger, on the other hand, was near tears at the end of the game. He couldn't believe that Georgia actually didn't fall into the trap. It was the first moment he thought Georgia actually had a chance to do something special that year. That's Tennessee hatred.  Being near tears after an uneventful win because you thought something really really crazy could've happened right until the final zeroes... that's traumatic hatred. Even though I didn't feel that way at the time, I understood it. And it was good to beat Tennessee. The sound of "not hearing Rocky Top every 5 minutes" is beautiful.

Things can change in an instant. The gaping mouth of the Tennessee fan watching a sure touchdown right before the half turn into a fumble return for a touchdown and basically the end of the game for a shell-shocked UT team. That's all you need to say about 2003. We expected a battle. One bounce of the ball turned it into a rout. An unexpected rout. And a hilariously enjoyable rout. Schadenfreude makes hatred fun. And I knew I really hated Tennessee when I couldn't tell if I was happier that Georgia won in this fashion or that Tennessee was the recipient. One other thing that shows how things can change quickly: my 4 undergrad years at UGA ended in 1999. I watched 4 losses to Tennessee. The Wrangler is 5 years younger than me and entered in 2000.  In his 4 undergrad years at UGA, he watched 4 wins against the Volunteers.

If there is a spectrum of hatred and how it applies to the chances of success against said hated opponent, it probably goes from hopeless-hate, doubtful-hate, simply-hate, confident-hate, and finally overconfident-hate. In some ways, the virulence of actual hatred works inverse to the chance of success. It's easy to hate when you don't have a chance, but easier to laugh at when you know you'll win (and laughing at is related to, but not pure hatred). From 1996 to 2004, Georgia fans probably experienced the entire spectrum. Unfortunately, 2004 was our overconfident year. We were experienced and talented. We had just pounded the defending national champions. We were ranked in the top 5. We had everything going for us. Nobody playing on the team had ever experienced a loss to Tennessee. We thought we owned them. And then the narrator from "Behind the Music" breaks the bad news. Tennessee still had some talent. Tennessee still could play defense. And Tennessee was tired of losing to a team that they once owned. Tennessee played great, and we didn't have answers until it was too late. When Greene's pass in the endzone to Leonard Pope fell incomplete, the giddy optimism that "this might really be our year" ended. Our overconfidence had led us to forget how much we hated Tennessee. We had our eyes on Florida and Auburn. We didn't hone our hatred enough. And it cost us dearly. Arguably the best team of my time as a Georgia fan didn't even win the SEC East. This is the lesson I learned: even when you're good, you have to remember how to hate. 

And from an overconfident level, we returned to simply hating Tennessee in 2005, and what resulted was probably the toughest, most hard-fought game of this series. Georgia played a man's game that day, running Thomas Brown over and over again, killing the clock and wearing down the strong Volunteer defensive line. It was a beating Georgia gave Tennessee, but not on the scoreboard. It was a reminder: we still hate you, and we won't forget. This is the kind of game I think of when I think of how I'd really like to beat a good team that I hate. Bareknuckled. Bloody.  

2006 was a game of two halves. The first half Georgia played way above their heads. Tereshinski was more efficient than he had a right to be.  We played the kind of game that was successful in '02 and '05. Then the second half started and it became a reverse of 2003. Special teams debacles. Interceptions and fumbles. In an instant a grinding game that we're very much in becomes a whirlwind blowout. Looking back, Georgia probably didn't have the advantage in talent in the game, but there was still no reason to give up 51 points. They bit us good and deep. And it stung. Walking out of the stadium, hearing Rocky Top again, it made me wonder whether we were on the right path. We were young, but what if we also weren't that good?  Tennessee reintroduced doubt, and that reinforced hatred. 

For the end of 2006, Georgia went on a pretty good run that made us all pretty optimistic entering 2007. We hung with Florida, pounded a much better Auburn team, beat Tech and came back against a pretty good Virginia Tech team. We shutout South Carolina and though we hadn't really been killing other teams, the defense looked outrageously good. Tennessee came in with Fulmer on the hot seat and needing a big win. Tennessee looked more prepared and executed exactly what they wanted to do. I was intensely frustrated with Georgia's response. We looked lackadaisical. We looked predictable. We looked like a Donnan-coached team. I was mad. And I had a 5 month old daughter taking a nap as I watched the game. She decided she didn't want to sleep. This was frustrating as well. I needed to think. What did this game mean to me?  I knew I couldn't let a poor performance of my team affect my personal life, like it did way back when. I was 30 years old. I had a kid. I had to figure it all out. And the Dawgs did too.  They were talented, and capable of beating anyone in the country. But they lapsed and let Tennessee beat them senseless. It was a wakeup call. What would they do? What would I do? Would Georgia keep doing what they've been doing and hope that things would change on their own, or that luck comes their way one time? Or would they shape things up and take control of the situation - embrace their id, play with more reckless abandonment, have a little fun out there? And what about me? Would I throw myself into worry and depression with each Saturday?  Would I allow my personality to get affected by this game, and, God forbid, let that affect how I engage with my family? Or would I take a step back and look at things in a different way? Instead of expecting something terrible to happen and driving myself crazy when it does, why not embrace the fact that I don't like other teams and let that be all it is? Why not always hope for something good to happen to the Dawgs, and if it doesn't, why not rely on hatred of that team to move past it? Instead of internalizing hatred and frustration, throw it out there and have fun with it, but let it go. Loosen up and quit worrying. That was the lesson of last year's Tennessee game. And Georgia went on an incredible run afterwards. For me personally, the lesson was "don't get so frustrated about losing this game - remember you've always hated those bastards, so be comfortable with that hatred and go play with your daughter." You wouldn't believe how much of a difference there is just by thinking a little differently.

And now we're here in 2008. I'm comfortable with my hatred of Tennessee, and, after taking a step back, I realize that my history of hating Tennessee is probably every bit as tortured and deep as my history of hating Florida. So how should I feel about this weekend's game? Well, I'm not going to worry about getting angry or frustrated if we lose. I want to win, and I'll be happy if we win. If we lose, I'll hate Tennessee no more than I already do. And that's a lot of hatred. So here's what I want: I want to beat them; I want to stick the knife in their gut and twist it; I want to hear silence instead of Rocky Top; I want next week's news to be dominated with "Will Fulmer be Fired?" stories; I want Tennessee fans to wonder if it was Cutcliffe that was all the brains; I want every top recruit looking at Tennessee and Georgia to think the Volunteers are a sinking ship; I want the Vols to switch quarterbacks 4 times because of obvious ineptitude; and I want Georgia to let them know they've been beaten really badly. Make it show. Make them bleed.  And if those things don't happen, I'll still hate them.  

That's the liberating thing about embracing hatred - it's always there to comfort the fall. When things are hopeless, hatred is key to just remaining a fan. But when things are good, and bad things happen, hating makes it easier.  

Read More...